𝐑𝐞𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐓𝐞𝐚𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐚𝐬 𝐚 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐟𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐢𝐧 𝐒𝐢𝐤𝐤𝐢𝐦

[𝘙𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘦𝘢𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘴’ 𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘦𝘮 𝘳𝘦𝘲𝘶𝘪𝘳𝘦𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘶𝘯𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘦 𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘵𝘩𝘴. 𝘚𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘮𝘢𝘺 𝘧𝘪𝘯𝘥 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘭𝘦 𝘶𝘯𝘴𝘦𝘵𝘵𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘨, 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘯 𝘶𝘯𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘦 - 𝘴𝘰 𝘐 𝘪𝘯𝘷𝘪𝘵𝘦 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘵𝘰 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘥 𝘪𝘵 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘰𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘴, 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘦 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘦𝘯𝘨𝘦𝘥.]

Teaching in Sikkim has increasingly become a profession that many are willing to leave, despite it often offering better pay than comparable positions in other sectors. A noticeable trend is that those who switch careers still expect to retain a same pay scale, indicating that dissatisfaction is rooted not merely in remuneration, but in deeper professional concerns.

What makes this situation more troubling is that a large number of these teachers are professionally qualified. Many were trained by the Education Department itself, often with full salary support during their training period. In addition, a significant proportion of pre-RTE teachers were granted advance increments in recognition of their qualifications. These well-intentioned incentives, designed to strengthen the system, have not ensured sustained commitment to the profession.

This pattern suggests that teaching is increasingly seen not as a vocation of choice, but as a fallback option within the government job market. While there may be several contributing factors - such as lack of recognition, curricular burdens in remote schools, and declining social prestige - these are realities that should be weighed carefully before entering the profession. To join without such consideration, and later seek to exit, raises questions of professional sincerity and also denies opportunities to those who might have embraced teaching with genuine commitment.

The consequences of this trend extend beyond individual career choices; they are clearly reflected in the functioning of government schools. When teaching is no longer guided by intrinsic motivation or a sense of purpose, classroom engagement weakens, accountability declines, and pedagogical innovation suffers - leaving teachers vulnerable to being drawn into political agendas that serve vested interests. Over time, this erodes student learning outcomes and undermines public confidence in the system.

Thus, the frequent criticism of government schools for underperformance cannot be viewed in isolation. It is, in part, a reflection of a deeper systemic issue - where teaching is not always chosen with conviction, and therefore not always practiced with the dedication it demands. Teaching is not merely a job; it requires integrity, commitment, and a genuine concern for learners. Without these, even the best policies and provisions struggle to translate into meaningful educational outcomes.
•••
https://sites.google.com/view/dhanbselingsubba-author/home