ASSESSMENT OF
PRE-PRIMARY EDUCATION IN THE SOUTH DISTRICT OF SIKKIM
-
Dhan Bahadur Subba,
Assistant Director HRDD/South
The type of
education designed for children prior to their formal entry into the education
system is referred to as pre-primary education. Pre-primary education targets
children aged 3 to 6 years and is regarded as a pivotal phase. This stage
offers children the chance to experience a miniature community setting where
they engage in daily work and play with peers of similar and differing ages.
Through this environment, potential biases and social difficulties are
preemptively addressed. Furthermore, pre-primary education serves to prepare
children for formal schooling and elevates their performance standards in
primary classes. This form of education holds significant value for the
physical, emotional, and cognitive growth of children, particularly those coming
from less-than-ideal home environments. The advancement of a nation is
intricately tied to the progression of its youngest citizens, prompting UNICEF
to use children's development as a gauge for national advancement.
The core
objective of pre-primary education is the all-encompassing growth of the child.
This development encompasses various facets, as delineated in the book "A
Guide for Nursery School Teachers" published by NCERT in 1978:
- Development of Physical Health and
Motor Skills;
- Development of Good Health Habits;
- Development of Desirable Social
Attitude and Manners;
- Development of Emotional Maturity;
- Development of Aesthetic Values;
- Stimulation of Intellectual
Curiosity;
- Encouraging Independence and
Creativity; and
- Development of Language.
In Sikkim,
pre-primary education is dispensed by both government entities and private
institutions, including the Human Resource Development Department, Social
Justice, Empowerment and Welfare Department, and private schools. The South
District alone houses 265 ICDS Centres managed by the Women and Child Division
of the Social Justice, Empowerment, and Welfare Department of the Sikkim
Government. These centers provide care and education for pre-primary children.
However, the instruction provided in these centers doesn't meet the criteria
for formal education and doesn't qualify for admission to Grade I in Government
Schools. Private schools also play a role in offering pre-primary education,
with 109 such schools in the South District. They offer playgroups, nursery
classes, Lower Kindergarten (L/KG), and Upper Kindergarten (U/KG) levels of
pre-primary education.
The Human
Resource Development Department is the largest contributor to pre-primary
education in the district, encompassing around 56% of children enrolled in
government schools. Pre-primary education is seamlessly integrated into the
formal school structure, with every school having a dedicated pre-primary
section. A teacher, known as the "School Mother," is assigned to
instruct these young learners. It's suggested that children should ideally be
five years old when entering pre-primary classes, setting them up for
enrollment in the regular school system at around the age of six, after
completing a year in pre-primary class.
As mentioned,
the education provided by ICDS centers isn't considered preschool education
according to government schools in the district. Consequently, whether children
attended ICDS centers or not, they must enroll in pre-primary classes. This
situation contributes to an accumulation of older children within the school
system, a factor associated with academic struggles and dropouts.
Hence, embarking
on a succinct inquiry into the age distribution of children registered in
pre-primary classes within government schools is deemed exceptionally valuable.
This research endeavor involved the meticulous selection of 66.82% of all
government schools in the district, accomplished through a rigorous process of
random sampling. The study, which focuses on the age distribution of children
participating in pre-primary classes within government schools, was executed
through a thoughtfully chosen sample of schools. This strategic approach
entailed the inclusion of 77.54% of schools from Namchi Sub-division and 49.42%
of schools from Ravang Sub-division, effectively enhancing the depth of insight
into the age-related dynamics among children enrolled in pre-primary education.
The primary objective of this undertaking was to aggregate age-specific
enrollment data specifically relevant to pre-primary classes. The information
collected was meticulously organized, taking into account factors such as
gender, age, and sub-division. The subsequent table, presented in this context,
furnishes a comprehensive overview of the dispersion of children among
different age groups who are actively participating in pre-primary education
within government schools.
Sub-Division |
<5 years |
5 years |
6 years |
7 years |
8 years |
|||||
|
B |
G |
B |
G |
B |
G |
B |
G |
B |
G |
Namchi |
6.99 |
7.43 |
19.41 |
19.13 |
14.09 |
12.76 |
6.88 |
6.21 |
2.94 |
1.39 |
Ravang |
4.50 |
5.18 |
16.37 |
17.05 |
15.69 |
16.23 |
8.05 |
7.91 |
3.27 |
2.46 |
District |
6.27 |
6.78 |
18.53 |
18.53 |
14.55 |
13.76 |
7.22 |
6.70 |
3.04 |
1.70 |
Sub-Division |
9 years |
10 years |
11 years |
12 years |
||||
|
B |
G |
B |
G |
B |
G |
B |
G |
Namchi |
0.94 |
0.78 |
0.61 |
0.28 |
0.00 |
0.06 |
0.11 |
0.00 |
Ravang |
0.82 |
0.82 |
0.68 |
0.27 |
0.27 |
0.41 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
District |
0.91 |
0.79 |
0.63 |
0.28 |
0.08 |
0.16 |
0.08 |
0.00 |
Source – School Report Card 2007
The children
attending the pre-primary class represent a diverse range of ages, spanning
from 4 to 12 years. When considering the entry age into the preschool system as
<6 years, the district only accounts for 50.11% of children within the
appropriate age range. This implies that a significant 49.89% of children
enrolled in pre-primary classes within government schools are actually older
than the ideal age.
As previously
stated, the educators responsible for instructing pre-primary classes in the
State are referred to as School Mothers, a designation reserved exclusively for
women. The process for appointing school mothers is straightforward, as
candidates are not required to undergo competitive examinations or interviews
for selection. Appointments are made solely at the discretion of area MLAs.
During the early 1980s, a considerable number of school mothers were hired with
an education level below matriculation, given that the position was remunerated
on a fixed-pay basis at that time. Subsequently, the requirements were revised,
and individuals with at least a matriculation qualification or a pre-primary
teacher training certificate received a standardized pay scale.
The State
Government has established a specific quota for school mothers who exhibit
higher qualifications in the primary teacher selection test. Consequently,
qualified and proficient school mothers are promoted to the role of primary
teachers, while those with lower qualifications remain at the pre-primary
level. This situation has led to a decline in the quality of pre-primary
education within the state, an issue that cannot be rectified easily. Moreover,
analyzing the results of annual examinations for the pre-primary class over the
past three years reveals an average failure rate of 46% each year.
The educational qualifications of school
mothers within the district are also a cause for concern. To address this, the
subsequent table has been included in this document.
Sub-Division |
Percentage of School Mothers by Qualification |
||||
Under Matric |
Class X |
Higher Sec |
Class XII |
Graduate |
|
Namchi Total |
24.67 |
45.33 |
3.33 |
24.67 |
2.00 |
Ravang Total |
19.48 |
49.35 |
2.60 |
23.38 |
5.19 |
District
Total |
22.91 |
46.70 |
3.08 |
24.23 |
3.08 |
Source: Teachers’ Bio-data Book 2007
The presented
table highlights that the majority of school mothers fall under the matriculate
category. Notably, 22.91% of school mothers in the district still possess below
the matriculation level of education.
In the course of
school visits, it has been observed that pre-primary classes in government
schools are not exclusively assigned to school mothers. Instead, primary
teachers are also deployed to teach these classes. While school administrators
argue that primary teachers are more qualified and efficient, and thus better
suited for the task, this practice cannot be endorsed due to the distinct
nature of pre-primary and primary education levels. The management of
classrooms, child interaction, teaching methodologies, and more, significantly
differ between pre-primary and primary levels. Technically, primary teachers
may lack the competence required for teaching pre-primary classes.
Teaching and
learning processes are intricate and require proper training. Entrusting a
teaching role to an individual without proper training is not advisable.
Pre-primary education, often termed early childhood education, is expected to
introduce foundational concepts like the 3 R's (reading, writing, arithmetic).
However, formal methods for introducing these concepts are discouraged, with
emphasis placed on activities and play-based approaches.
An observation
has been made that the assessment of children attending pre-primary classes in
government schools is conducted in a formative manner, which may not be
conducive to their learning experience. It is recommended that the assessment
methods for pre-primary children should be continuous and comprehensive.
Additionally, the retention of children in this class should be avoided.
A suggestion is
put forth to categorize the pre-primary class into three groups based on the
children's ages within a classroom, facilitating multilevel teaching. The
proposed age-based segregation could be structured as follows:
- Children aged 3 years in
Pre-primary - “C” Group
- Children aged 4 years in
Pre-primary - “B” Group
- Children aged 5 years in
Pre-primary - “A” Group
This arrangement
ensures that a child enters the primary level at precisely 6 years old and
prevents the accumulation of overage children in the pre-primary level.
***
References:
1. Safaya, Dr. R.N., Current Problems in Indian Education, p. 23
2. DOABA Pre-Primary and Nursery Teachers’ Training/Education Guide, p.
A-72
3. The Education Commission (1964-66)
4. A Guide for Nursery School Teachers, 1978
5. Teachers’ Bio Data Book 2007
6. School Report Cards DISE
(A paper written in 2007)
No comments:
Post a Comment